Reflections on a half century


Well, today I became another year older (not necessarily a year wiser), somewhat deeper in debt ($4.25 a gallon for regular unleaded), and now is a good a time to reflect as any (the rum hasn’t kicked in yet).

And reflect I did.

To the positive side of the ledger:

  • Even as poor as we are out here in the hinterlands, having seen what it is like to be really poor, while overseas, still helps to kind of keep things in perspective.  I could (still) indeed be worse.  We have a roof over our heads, food in our bellies, gainful (if somewhat underpaid) employment, and a wealth, unmeasured, of family and friends whose bonds are themselves more precious than gold.
  • Reasonably good health, and even with an imperfect health system/insurance, access to the most modern of medical technology.  This done without the “benefit” of “Obamacare”.
  • Freedom to travel though out the country, when ever the mood or opportunity strikes us.
  • Freedom to choose where we want to live and or work (assuming you have the money for the former, and meet the skill-set[s] for the latter).
  • Relative safety in ones travels throughout the country (admittedly, there are areas throughout the country which are not as safe as others, and some which are flat-out “unsafe”)
  • A rich harvest of foods, meats, fish and fowl, and drink of which to choose from, in preparing for ones meals.
  • A diverse choice of viewpoints on almost any given subject, idea, or belief.  And the ability, with minimal effort, to be able to research or view same.
  • … (fill in the blank)

Now considering all the above, you would think we were still in the 50’s or 60’s.  On the face of it there does not seem to be much difference.  But that would be misleading and mistaken.

Looking at the negative side of the ledger:

  • The purchasing power of the dollar, compared to where it was 50 years ago, is not nearly as strong.
  • The “gap” between those who are in the top 2% of the wealthiest in this country , and those on the bottom couple of rungs. (the middle class be shrinking)
  • The (continuing) debasement/dissolution of the “traditional” family.
  • The (continuing) debasement/dissolution of what was once considered “traditional” cultural norms.
  • The encroachment of government (local/state/federal) into almost every aspect of society and or individual lives.
  • The loss of even any attempt by all/any media to provide something akin to objective reporting (opinion pieces and editorials aside).
  • … (fill in the blank)

It would seem the pluses outweigh  the negatives.  But both lists are purposefully left incomplete.  There is a final entry on each for you, dear reader(s) in which to add to either list.  I would be interested in what you all come up with.

Frankly, I do not feel this is in any way shape or form, the same country it was a mere fifty years ago.  Have there been some positive changes since then?  Yes.  But at the end of the day, I can’t honestly say we as a nation, a culture or a peoples, are better for all which has been allowed to evolve since then.  And not every chance brought about in the last half century has been good for us. (Even if based on “good intent’, despite what the media or government may say.  The Patriot Act and the EPA are two good examples of that.)   This country has become increasingly polarized.  Become increasingly divided along any number of fault lines.

I have had faith in the people to, at the end of the day, stand up for what is right and true about us as a nation, a culture, and a people.  That a horrific event, such as what happened in September of 2001 would unite us against the enemies without as much as it would call to bring those with in our borders to accountability of their actions (or lack there of).  Sadly, with a few exceptions, this did not happen.   And so we are where we are today.

I wonder what will be left of this nation, and its grand experiment, at the end of the next fifty years.

Advertisements

5 Comments

Filed under Random Thoughts

5 responses to “Reflections on a half century

  1. Freedom to (so far) defend ourselves. The freedom to be a complete ass if we choose. I don’t believe in the right of Westboro folks to trash our servicemen’s funerals at all, however – I was very disappointed in the SCOTUS. I simply cannot accept that our soldiers have fought and died for the right of persons or groups to crush people while they are in mourning.

    On the flips side, the search for erosion of freedoms continues unabated. Case in point – that anyone would consider that it might be acceptable even as a study to put black boxes in our vehicles in order to tax us by the mile as we drive from point A to point B. Anyone seriously foolish enough to believe that tracking capability would not be utilized has never heard of OnStar or used a credit card.

    • I was thinking about this (and along with a number of family related issues) I finally have arrived at an answer.

      I would love to be able to take each and every one of the Westboro folk (and their fellow travelers), tar and feather them, and ride them out of town on a very rough rail, at each and every funeral they chose to show up at and try their damnedest to despoil. The way I see it, that would be my constitutionally protected right to free speech, in the form of a rebuttal.

      There is a fine line here. Free speech is one thing (and I include the Nazis marching in Skokie … and elsewhere …, along with flag burning … ours or anyone else’s. The big difference between the above two examples, and the Westboro cumbubbles is the Westboro folks (it could be argued) are by their actions causing undo pain/suffering, and or hardship to the families of our fallen warriors. This could be emotional and or physical, and I could care less which, both are reason enough in my book, to make this akin to battery (or assault, not a lawyer so not sure which may be applicable). Though SCOTUS has ruled, I wonder if another case, one which goes specifically toward the cause and effect aspect. In other words, “You have the right to say (and to some lesser extent, do) what you want to in the act of expressing your thoughts. I have the right to respond in a manner which reflects directly on your initial actions/statement.”

      You burn a flag, a book, desecrate a religious item, then expect to have some sort of public outcry to same, if the majority (or sufficiently large enough minority) of people who may be effected or impacted, find out (or directly witness) your deeds.

      You attempt to disrupt a funeral, wake, or other gathering, with the express intent of promoting not your particular point of view, but a willingness to “hurt” (emotionally/mentally/ or physically) any of the participants, then you are no longer acting on a freedom of speech platform, but one of intent to harm another person or persons, and as such are fair game to have pain inflicted on you.

  2. Dick

    Happy belated Birthday, young’n!

    • Thanks! But sadly, I have passed young’n status awhile back. Hell, I even qualify for the senior discount at Denny’s now! Still, there is less gray on the old noggin than my dad had at this age. And I still vaguely recall what it is that you use your third leg for, besides taking a leak.

      Hope all is well with you and Kelly, and again, give my continued good wishes for a fair wind and following seas to your genetic hostage.

  3. Thank you for a great post.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s